While an influential lobby group is scrambling to modify a measure cutting into First Amendment rights, free speech advocates warn a floated adjustment would not prevent harm to Texans.

While an influential lobby group is scrambling to modify a measure cutting into First Amendment rights, free speech advocates warn a floated adjustment would not prevent harm to Texans.
A proposal to allow teachers to pray on duty sparked heated debate over the U.S. Supreme Court’s position on the separation of church and state.
The legislation gives this rogue agency new tools to punish political speech, all while insulating it from meaningful accountability.
The Institute for Free Speech warned that Texas’ interpretation of lobbying could have ensnared the Founding Fathers themselves.
“It’s not easy, I understand. It’s certainly not intuitive,” said TEC Chairman Randy Erben, explaining the state’s lobbyist registration laws.
Free speech is the foundation upon which all other freedoms rest.
Phelan stood firm on his view of the legislation’s necessity, at one point suggesting that its penalties should be even stricter.
Courts have routinely struck down laws that regulate political discourse based on content, citing the First Amendment’s strong protections for satire and parody.
The measures would include protections allowing public school teachers to use students’ biological pronouns and to pray in school.
A similar measure targeting the state’s anti-SLAPP laws was pushed last session before hitting a roadblock.